Issue link: http://trailridermagazine.uberflip.com/i/318411
W e were fortunate enough to test many of the 300cc two-strokes, save for the Beta and Husqvarna. As we had already plunked our money down on the Beta 250, we weren't about the do the same for their 300, which is too bad because it likely would have shined in our eastern woods setting. However, we can include the Sherco and GasGas in this comparison. Earlier in the year, we described the 300 two-stroke as the best of both worlds; meaning you can rev it like a 250 (hold on!) and also have tons of torque at your dis- posal. The 300 can be lugged easier than the 250 but still win a corner to corner race when wrung out. Hence, the best of both worlds claim. That wasn't always the case. Not too long ago, 300s hit hard in the mid range and could get a rider in trouble when ridden too aggressively. Now, it seems that the motor is more linear, making it easier to ride aggressively, if that's your thing. Motor The common characteristic of each motor is that they produce four-stroke-esque torque. Actually, they produce more torque and can lug down low in a way the mod- ern four-stroke cannot. The Sherco and GasGas produce the most torque and can grunt along without fear of stalling. Their specialties are putting power to the ground in a controlled, manageable fashion. In terms of a smooth power delivery and turn- ing technical terrain into a fun afternoon, all of the bikes do extraordinarily well—it's just that the Sherco and GasGas have heavier flywheels and are therefore less prone to stalling. The most aggressive motor belongs to the KTM XC. The 300 XC is a fire-breathing dragon, especially with the red power spring inserted. The XC-W can keep it in sight, but the aggressive motor on the XC sets it apart from the others without much sacri- 300 cc 2-Stroke Comparison 2014 May/June 2014 31